According to Lent (2000), what place does
animation occupy in Asian societies? How different is this across Asia (ie
comparing China and Japan)?
According
to Lent (2000) the influence of Walt Disney in the early 1900’s characterized
many of the stories and styles of animation across Asia. Many animators such as
Osamu Tezuka from Japan and James Wang from Taiwan were happy to be recognized
as the ‘Disney’ of their countries (Lent, 2000). The occupation of animation in
Asian societies has had huge impact in terms of economy and production (Lent,
2000). Through mass media, anime has become a global market that has evolved
from the imitation of Walt Disney in the early 1900’s to stylized illustrations
that in Japan, embody pop culture and in China, focus on pleasing and
educational stories that showcase national pride (Lent, 2000).
The
Wan brothers of China, after observing American animation, created Uproar in an art studio (1926) and then
their first full-length animated film, Princess
with the iron fan (1941), these were created with a very western style,
with many features like large expressive eyes taken from Disney and the
Fleischer brothers (Lent, 2000). While western style had huge popularity, the
imitation could not last and the Wan brothers understood the need to create
‘Chinese’ animation that was culturally Chinese through the inclusion of tradition,
values, way of life and the application of Chinese techniques such as ink wash
and folded paper, which emphasized the uniquely Chinese adaption (Lent, 2000).
The political change in China reduced the production of animation to stories
that involved political campaigns and government goals, which highlighted morals
and values, for example One night in an
art gallery (1978) centers on the enemies of the state. Other popular and
chosen themes are folklore and mythology; the animation Havoc in heaven (1964) is adapted from the classic Chinese
literature Journey to the west (Lent, 2000).
In
comparison to China, Japan has developed anime into a pop culture phenomenon
that has affected mass media (Napier, 2005). One of Japan’s earliest and
recognized animators, Osamu Tezuka, drew inspiration from Disney, and the appearance
between Kimba the white lion (1966)
and The lion king (1994) sparked
interest over the similarities, which could suggest that as Tezuka was open
about his fondness and imitation of Disney, Disney might have also found an
inspiration in Tezuka’s work. Another Japanese animator, Hayao Miyazaki
attracted global audiences through his works from Studio Ghibli, such as
Spirited away (2001), put Japanese anime on the map. Anime has found its place
within Japanese society; it has become an essential product with close ties to
manga, video games, and cosplay. While there are vast differences between Chinese
and Japanese animation, the incorporation of history, tradition, religion,
mythology and pop culture has established its place in society.
Lent, J. A. (2000). Animation in Asia: appropriation, reinterpretation and adoption or
adaption. Retrieved 8 September, 2014 from http://tlweb.latrobe.edu.au/humanities/screeningthepast/firstrelease/fr1100/jlfr11c.htm
Napier, S. (2005). Anime and local/global
identity. In Anime: from Akira to Hows
moving castle (pp. 15-34). Hampshire: Palgrave/Macmillan.
Nice post, thanks Eloise. A well developed argument that engages with the secondary texts. Your examples (particularly of Chinese ideological animations) are well chosen.
ReplyDeleteIt's good point, Eloise. I think animation is a tool for expressing any views. It is an effective way for having a message across.Using animaion would be a lot more attention grabbing than anything else.
ReplyDeleteThanks. Good.
DeleteHello, Eloise. It was easy to understand and read what you were trying to prove here. I agree with your points on Asian animation being influenced by western animation such as Disney. I also like how you have gave examples of animations in each culture. I would like to add a comment on animation occupy in Korean society.They have banned Animation in the 1990's as the animation wasn't suit to children such as it too violent and sexually inappropriate.
ReplyDelete